Ford Pinto Fuel Tank Controversy
businesses for the most part do not offer products and services for the joy of going through the motions of production, marketing and sales. The driving motivation for any business is to earn a profit. In fact profits are the principal reason any private company is in business. Earning profits is as American as motherhood and the Fourth of July. But what are the ethical boundaries a company should adhere to in order to assure a profitable outcome for stakeholders? This is the central issue to be addressed in this paper, and the issue that will be focused on is a darkly unethical decision by executives in the Ford Motor Company in the 1970s. Knowing full well that the gas tank on the Ford Pinto could (and did) explode on impact, the decision-makers at Ford went ahead with production and balanced the cost of upgrading the gas tank with the cost of future lawsuits from drivers' deaths. Why this thesis is valid: a) reason one: making a corporate decision strictly based on profit and pushing aside consumer safety issues is unconscionable; and b) reason two: being aware of the inherent danger of their product and not making the changes that would improve the car is inexcusable.
Defense of the Thesis -- Corporate Rush to Profit
The Ford Motor Company was facing very strong competition from smaller cars that got better mileage than Ford's gas-guzzling sedans, so they needed to introduce a more economical car. In particular, the Volkswagen and other foreign autos were flooding the market and Ford understood that to remain competitive in the auto industry it had to come up with...
However, all the machinery for assembly-line production was already tooled and in place and because Ford was in a big rush to make profits (by successfully competing with Volkswagen, et al.) the company decided not to upgrade the fuel system to make the car safe. Ford President Lee Iacocca insisted that the car be in showrooms by a certain date, and because re-tooling the design and production of the car would take about 18 months, engineers went with the faulty design just to get the car into showrooms and on the road (Dowie, 48).
Defense of the Thesis -- Forty Test Crashes Showed Gas Tank Flaws
In each of forty crash tests of the Pinto, it was revealed that when the Pinto was hit from behind by a car traveling over twenty-five miles per hour, that resulted in "a ruptured fuel tank" (Dowie, 48). And yet, under oath during lawsuits, Ford officials "denied…having crash-tested the pinto" (Dowie, 48).
Defense of the Thesis -- Iacocca Resisted Safety Changes
Did anyone go to Iacocca and tell him the Pinto gas tank represented a potential deadly danger to drivers? "Hell no," said an engineer who was pivotal on the production of the Pinto. Anyone telling Iacocca that…
